- Casino Royale Review
- Carrie (1976)
- Two-Lane Blacktop (1971)
- Trainspotting (1996)
- Rain Man (1988)
- Fatal Attraction (1987)
- Targets (1968)
- An Education (2009)
- Mirror, The (1974)
- Fargo (1996)
- Fight Club (1999)
- Do The Right Thing (1989)
- Report (1967)
- Is "The Sting" The Best Gambling Film Ever Made?
- Pink Flamingos (1972)
- Ox-Bow Incident, The (1943), Or 28 Angry Men
- Rome, Open City (1945)
- Spring in a Small Town (1948)
- Drive (2011)
- Vinyl (1965)
- Seconds (1966)
- Rosemary's Baby (1968)
- A Hollywood Invasion of Casino Halls
- Thin Man, The (1934)
- In The Heat of the Night (1967)
- All In: The Poker Movie, Player’s Best Tricks
- Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)
- 1001 Club - Skyfall (2012)
- 1001 Club - When Harry Met Sally... (1988)
- 1001 Club - Rain Man (1988)
Queezy Subjects: Exploring the Darker Side of Film
A little bit of the old Ultra-violence
Hi Kiddies...
This was going to remain merely a little Aftertaste segment at the end of Lone Wolf and Cub: Baby Cart to Hades, but as I typed, I realized that this topic is one I haven't heard broached too often, and one worthy of exploration.
Let me give all the film viewers and makers out there the lowdown on a touchy little subject in film: The Rape Scene.
Everyone in the world knows that rape is an atrocious crime, and due to its impact, including such a scene in a film must serve an equally heavy purpose. Typically, in film it's used in one of three ways:
Rape as "The Ordinary World":
When a story begins with rape, it sets the tone of the universe around us most effectively. Such a shocking event drives home quickly and perfectly the state of things. A land where lawlessness and criminal acts of this calibre exist is a bad, immoral place, and/or the people committing those acts are without a doubt the ones in the wrong. Plots tend to lean towards themes of justice, chivalry, and vengeance, that sort of thing. We also are left without any mystery as to the dark nature of those committing the act.
In Lone Wolf and Cub: Baby Cart to Hades (1972) for example, the first scene opens with bored part-time Samurai taking what they want from women passing by. We know now that they're the bad guys, that this land is without order, and that they are going to suffer for what they did, enhancing the righteousness of our hero. The same is true of The Crow (1994), which includes this grimmest act of wanton violence in the mix with assault, arson and murder at the beginning of the film. On the lighter side, we have The Evil Dead (1981), where the demons that inhabit a possessed forest prove how sinister they are by having tree branches pin down and subsequently molest someone trying to escape. In A Clockwork Orange (1971), we have an exception. Our protagonist is the one committing such sins, introducing the boldest example of a morality question in a Man vs. Society plot. In all these cases, the point is that the assailants are bad and we get it. Used in this way, rape is a symbol of a world that is evil, sinful and wild.

Rape as Plot:
Then we have our last example,
Rape as Character Development:
This use includes the act not as integral plot, not as statement of macrocosmic truth, but rather as a catalyst for change on a more minor scale. Perhaps the character can cope better than others, or it's just part of the occupational hazard of being in a particular situation, but it is an event that brings us to realize that minor changes are to take place due to this heavy event. For example we have Elizabeth Shue's gang rape by frat boys in Leaving Las Vegas (1995) that serves as a reminder of the danger she faces as a prostitute, and enhances to the audience the type of person she must be, or needs to become to change or cope. In American History X (1998), we have prison rape used on Ed Norton as punishment for insubordination. This reveals to him all too much about the nature of those he once associated with, and begins his maturity towards open-mindedness and acceptance. Pulp Fiction (1994) is another fantastic example, as it uses this act not only to cause the audience to just sit there with mouths agape at the odd non sequitur, but it creates opportunity for deeper characterization, as we grow to understand the moralities of our two victims like no other thing could show us.
Now here's the lesson: Rape is not something people want when they consider going out to see a movie that's going to be 'a good time', so there must be common rules of decency to be used when considering using this scene in a film.
In the event that a film should use Rape as "The Ordinary World", be aware that this is merely a symbolic representation of the world's ills, and does not do anything to advance the plot. The point is made clear in seconds, rather than minutes, so when not integral, spare us the details, it doesn't turn us on, and you risk turning a good time into an awkward moment.
The opposite is true with Rape as Plot. If you ask me, draw it out. If this is a horrible event that our characters can't deal with, something that is so traumatic that they go out of their way to commit acts of vengeance upon the aggressors, or devote the next few months or years to seeking justice. Why should we not also feel the full effect, connecting tragically with our protagonist? You probably know going in that this is not some popcorn-Smores-slumber-party night movie, so hit us hard. I say if you're making this theme into a movie, make it right, zoom in up close and make us feel truly uncomfortable.
Rape as Character Development is about the moment, it should never be as graphic or long-lasting as Rape as Plot, but should drive the point home just enough. In the films I've seen, often the next scene hits home harder and reminds us better than the act itself: Ed Norton sitting down uncomfortably, Elizabeth Shue bleeding out in the shower.
Film is a medium where the most tragic tales can be told, where we can explore the darkest side of human nature, but this is a medium for an audience, and keeping that audience ever in mind, including such a scene should be pored over and reconsidered several times before leaving it as part of the final edit.
Finally, more than anything else, don't use it to arouse us. Doing so is a terrible disservice unto society as a whole. No matter how cool Pulp Fiction may be, Rape is not, even if you use Sexploitation as an excuse.
Thanks for reading kiddies...
I guess I used the wrong words in 'rules of decency'. I meant, use your common sense and impose limits based on the need, rather than making it gratuitous. Hey I'm all for The Hays Law being struck down. As for 'Kika' I've never seen it!
"Good art can take us out of our comfort zones and allow us to explore the darkest recesses of the human soul" - well said, and I know we share that and I know we prefer depth and tragedy to fluff and comedy.
I know that when you said "rules of decency" that you weren't referring to a governing body. I guess what I was getting at was that the notion of moderation or violence that's necessary in the context of the film can vary widely from person to person.
Of course now I sound like some violence-mongering perv. I'm the first to admit that there are some movies out there that are in very poor taste in which violence is pretty much the only resource the director can muster up to hold the audience's attention.
Hmmm...Can't say that I'm too keen on "rules of decency". I'm not saying that every film has to be an orgy of rape and Mayhem, but that doesn't mean that every rape - or any other act of violence, for that matter, has to adhere to any rules of good taste.
Good taste can often be the antithesis of good art. I guess the main example I'm thinking of is Almodovar's "Kika", which features, among the other themes of serial killing and incest, a VERY long and drawn out rape that is played for laughs. That's right - it's a ten minute comical and very graphic rape scene.
Offensive? I suppose. The people in the theater seemed to have two very distinct reactions - half walked out during the scene in disgust. The other half stayed and laughed. I was one of the ones that stayed and laughed. I loved that film. Good art can take us out of our comfort zones and allow us to explore the darkest recesses of the human soul - and some art can make us laugh along the way.
I think that instead of having a set guideline of what you consider to be in good taste, it's more important to regard each film as an individual expereience and be honest and truthful in your reaction. If you're offended then you're completely justified to stop watching the film, if you're not, then stay and watch it.
Even thougnh we all do it, having pre-conceived notions of when something is and isn't appropriate in any piece of art - even on a personal level - is something I try to avoid. It sounds idiotic, but I prefer to just stumble into the experience and react to what I see on a purely emotional level.